iVisa

Select Your Language

Select Your Currency

  • AED United Arab Emirates Dirham
  • AFN Afghan Afghani
  • ALL Albanian Lek
  • AMD Armenian Dram
  • ANG Netherlands Antillean Guilder
  • AOA Angolan Kwanza
  • ARS Argentine Peso
  • AUD Australian Dollar
  • AWG Aruban Florin
  • AZN Azerbaijani Manat
  • BAM Bosnia-Herzegovina Convertible Mark
  • BBD Barbadian Dollar
  • BDT Bangladeshi Taka
  • BGN Bulgarian Lev
  • BIF Burundian Franc
  • BMD Bermudan Dollar
  • BND Brunei Dollar
  • BOB Bolivian Boliviano
  • BRL Brazilian Real
  • BSD Bahamian Dollar
  • BWP Botswanan Pula
  • BZD Belize Dollar
  • CAD Canadian Dollar
  • CDF Congolese Franc
  • CHF Swiss Franc
  • CLP Chilean Peso
  • CNY Chinese Yuan
  • COP Colombian Peso
  • CRC Costa Rican Colón
  • CVE Cape Verdean Escudo
  • CZK Czech Republic Koruna
  • DJF Djiboutian Franc
  • DKK Danish Krone
  • DOP Dominican Peso
  • DZD Algerian Dinar
  • EGP Egyptian Pound
  • ETB Ethiopian Birr
  • EUR Euro
  • FJD Fijian Dollar
  • FKP Falkland Islands Pound
  • GBP British Pound Sterling
  • GEL Georgian Lari
  • GIP Gibraltar Pound
  • GMD Gambian Dalasi
  • GNF Guinean Franc
  • GTQ Guatemalan Quetzal
  • GYD Guyanaese Dollar
  • HKD Hong Kong Dollar
  • HNL Honduran Lempira
  • HTG Haitian Gourde
  • HUF Hungarian Forint
  • IDR Indonesian Rupiah
  • ILS Israeli New Sheqel
  • INR Indian Rupee
  • ISK Icelandic Króna
  • JMD Jamaican Dollar
  • JPY Japanese Yen
  • KES Kenyan Shilling
  • KGS Kyrgystani Som
  • KHR Cambodian Riel
  • KMF Comorian Franc
  • KRW South Korean Won
  • KYD Cayman Islands Dollar
  • KZT Kazakhstani Tenge
  • LAK Laotian Kip
  • LBP Lebanese Pound
  • LKR Sri Lankan Rupee
  • LRD Liberian Dollar
  • LSL Lesotho Loti
  • MAD Moroccan Dirham
  • MDL Moldovan Leu
  • MGA Malagasy Ariary
  • MKD Macedonian Denar
  • MNT Mongolian Tugrik
  • MOP Macanese Pataca
  • MUR Mauritian Rupee
  • MVR Maldivian Rufiyaa
  • MWK Malawian Kwacha
  • MXN Mexican Peso
  • MYR Malaysian Ringgit
  • MZN Mozambican Metical
  • NAD Namibian Dollar
  • NGN Nigerian Naira
  • NIO Nicaraguan Córdoba
  • NOK Norwegian Krone
  • NPR Nepalese Rupee
  • NZD New Zealand Dollar
  • OMR Omani Rial
  • PAB Panamanian Balboa
  • PEN Peruvian Nuevo Sol
  • PGK Papua New Guinean Kina
  • PHP Philippine Peso
  • PKR Pakistani Rupee
  • PLN Polish Zloty
  • PYG Paraguayan Guarani
  • QAR Qatari Rial
  • RON Romanian Leu
  • RSD Serbian Dinar
  • RUB Russian Ruble
  • RWF Rwandan Franc
  • SAR Saudi Riyal
  • SBD Solomon Islands Dollar
  • SCR Seychellois Rupee
  • SEK Swedish Krona
  • SGD Singapore Dollar
  • SHP Saint Helena Pound
  • SLL Sierra Leonean Leone
  • SOS Somali Shilling
  • SRD Surinamese Dollar
  • SVC Salvadoran Colón
  • SZL Swazi Lilangeni
  • THB Thai Baht
  • TJS Tajikistani Somoni
  • TOP Tongan Pa anga
  • TRY Turkish Lira
  • TTD Trinidad and Tobago Dollar
  • TWD New Taiwan Dollar
  • TZS Tanzanian Shilling
  • UAH Ukrainian Hryvnia
  • UGX Ugandan Shilling
  • USD United States Dollar
  • UYU Uruguayan Peso
  • UZS Uzbekistan Som
  • VND Vietnamese Dong
  • VUV Vanuatu Vatu
  • WST Samoan Tala
  • XAF CFA Franc BEAC
  • XCD East Caribbean Dollar
  • XOF CFA Franc BCEAO
  • XPF CFP Franc
  • YER Yemeni Rial
  • ZAR South African Rand
  • ZMW Zambian Kwacha
The UK ETA: A necessary security measure, or a political and economic tool?
Photo of Sergio Merino Sergio Merino
5 min read
Updated on Sep 26, 2024
Summary
  • Everyone visiting the UK from April 2025 who doesn’t hold British or Irish citizenship will require the new travel document
  • Non-EU citizens can start applying for the UK ETA from November 27, 2024
  • iVisa Co-Founder Sergio Merino asks what the real motivations are behind the new scheme
  • The new UK ETA follows in the footsteps of the Australian ETA and the US ESTA

By April 2025, anyone visiting the UK without British or Irish citizenship will need a UK ETA before arriving into the country. iVisa Co-Founder Sergio Merino takes a deeper dive into the reasons behind this decision and whether it will serve the purpose it claims.

By now, most people worldwide are familiar with Brexit and its significant impact on the UK’s place in Europe. As a European, witnessing one of the EU's founding members depart was disheartening. But rather than diving into the myriad complexities of Brexit, I want to focus on a specific development that has caught my attention: the launch of the UK’s Electronic Travel Authorization (ETA).

Having spent over a decade running a global travel visa company, I've seen countless border control measures rolled out across the world. With this experience in mind, the introduction of the UK ETA merits deeper scrutiny.

Many readers are probably wondering about the practicalities of the UK ETA – when it starts, what it costs, and how to apply. However, a more compelling question might be: Why has the UK decided to introduce this ETA, and does it truly serve the purpose it claims?

Australia was a pioneer in electronic immigration systems, introducing its ETA back in 1996

To answer this, it’s useful to compare the UK’s move with the immigration policies of countries with similar systems, such as Australia and the United States. Both nations have implemented electronic travel authorizations, and their experiences offer insight into why the UK might be following suit.

The Australian ETA: A precedent for control and revenue

Australia was a pioneer in electronic immigration systems, introducing its ETA back in 1996. At the time, it was a practical solution to manage the anticipated influx of travelers for the 2000 Olympics. For countries already requiring visas, immigration procedures were stringent, but the ETA allowed Australia to monitor visitors from nations that previously did not need a visa, thanks to reciprocal agreements.

Initially, travelers were barely aware of the ETA because it was seamlessly integrated into travel booking systems like Sabre and Amadus, making the process almost invisible. But as the program expanded, Australia began charging a fee, and now, with 10 million ETA-eligible travelers annually, the system generates about $200 million annually.

Interestingly, this revenue is reinvested into promoting Australian tourism, demonstrating that while security may have been the initial driver, financial and political factors have become just as important.

The US ESTA: Security or economics?

The US followed a similar path with its Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA).

The US ESTA now generates substantial income – around $300 million annually. In addition to its revenue generation, ESTA has become a political tool

Introduced in 2008, the US ESTA was a response to the 9/11 attacks, and its primary purpose was framed as national security. But just two years later, the US started charging for ESTA under the Travel Promotion Act, redirecting this revenue toward promoting tourism.

Like Australia's system, the US ESTA now generates substantial income – around $300 million annually. In addition to its revenue generation, ESTA has become a political tool. While most applicants are approved, those from or who have visited countries under US sanctions, such as Cuba, are often denied. This underscores the point that ETAs are as much about diplomacy and economics as they are about security.

The UK ETA: A political and economic move?

Given the precedents set by Australia and the US, it was only a matter of time before the UK introduced its own ETA, especially in the aftermath of Brexit. The UK’s departure from the EU has allowed it to reclaim control over its immigration policies, and the ETA fits squarely into the government’s broader goal of tightening border control.

However, unlike the US, which offered the ESTA for free initially, the UK is charging for the ETA from the start. This suggests that the UK has learned from its counterparts – that travelers will pay for entry, especially if the fee is framed as a security measure. But is security the real reason for this move?

I believe there are deeper motivations. The estimated 20 million visitors who will need an ETA each year will generate significant revenue – around £200 million – for the UK government. This money will likely be funneled into promoting British tourism, much like the US and Australia have done.

In addition, ETAs help shape diplomatic relations. By requiring visas from certain countries while granting ETA eligibility to others, governments can exert pressure or extend goodwill. This is a clear example of how immigration policy can be used as a political tool rather than solely a security measure.

In the case of the UK ETA, it feels like a financial and diplomatic strategy cloaked in the language of security – a pattern we’ve seen before, and one we will undoubtedly see again.

The bigger picture: Are ETAs really about security?

With the EU also set to launch its own version, ETIAS (European Travel Information and Authorization System), it seems that ETAs are becoming the global norm. But are they truly about enhancing security? In my view, while security may be part of the equation, the broader motivation behind these systems is political and economic. Countries use ETAs to generate revenue, promote tourism, and influence diplomatic relations. Furthermore, the fact that many countries are developing their own systems rather than collaborating on a unified, global solution raises questions about whether security is really the driving force.

In the end, ETAs do provide a layer of control over who enters a country. But if security were truly the primary concern, wouldn’t nations work together to create a shared global platform rather than building separate, revenue-generating systems? The trend toward individual ETAs suggests otherwise: these measures are as much about politics and economics as they are about safety.

In the case of the UK ETA, it feels like a financial and diplomatic strategy cloaked in the language of security – a pattern we’ve seen before, and one we will undoubtedly see again.

Read more about the UK ETA

Chat on WhatsApp
Intercom Chat